Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorIrvine, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMicheli, Anthony
dc.date2017-05-19
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T16:21:59Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T16:21:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/19841
dc.description.abstractThis study presents the issues inherent in the existing framework for evaluating alleged insider trading violations and proposes that the United States replace these rules and legal precedents with a statutory provision that both defines and expressly prohibits insider trading on the basis of an equality of access theory. To this end, the paper presents the origins of insider trading law, with particular emphasis on tipper-tippee liability, and ultimately seeks to demonstrate both philosophically and by example that an equality of access standard is more ethically sound and practical from an enforceability standpoint. It is meant to bear stylistic similarities to a law review article, with the goal of providing useful information and guidance for practitioners.
dc.subjectinsider trading
dc.subjecttipping
dc.subjecttipper-tippee liability
dc.subjectsecurities law
dc.subjectsecurities market
dc.subjectstock exchange
dc.subjectMNPI
dc.subjectmaterial nonpublic information
dc.subjectequality of access theory
dc.subjectRegulation FD
dc.subjectSecurities Exchange Act of 1934
dc.subjectRule 10b-5
dc.subjectChiarella
dc.subjectO'Hagan
dc.subjectmisappropriation theory
dc.subjectNewman
dc.subjectSalman
dc.subjectMarket Abuse Directive
dc.subjectS.702
dc.subjectS. 702
dc.subjectSecurities and Exchange Commission
dc.subjectSEC
dc.titleThe Tipping Point: Federal Securities Law and the Preservation of Market Integrity
etd.degree.departmentFinance
local.collegeNeeley School of Business
local.collegeJohn V. Roach Honors College
local.departmentFinance


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record