Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorTate, Gary
dc.contributor.authorHeckathorn, Amy Christineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T15:10:30Z
dc.date.available2019-10-11T15:10:30Z
dc.date.created1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifieraleph-822235en_US
dc.identifierMicrofilm Diss. 745.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/32720
dc.description.abstractMany great changes have taken place in the oversight and administration of writing programs in colleges and universities in the United States. This evolution, however, has not been an unimpeded eventuality; writing program administrators (WPAs) have struggled for professional training, power, identity-formation, and recognition. It is this struggle toward professionalization which this dissertation documents. No written histories exist to chronicle the evolution of WPAs¿no unified and coherent accounting addresses their historical and current work. In an effort to begin to fill this void, I argue for an interpretation of the evolution of WPAs compiled from primary research in journals, books, and direct interviews¿an interpretation which asserts that WPAs have struggled to transform themselves, and other's impressions of them, from bureaucratic managers of an undervalued discipline to dynamic administrators and theorizers of their work and their field. I examine WPAs' struggle toward professionalization in three time periods: what I call the Early Era (1940¿1963), when WPAs began to identify the problems confronting professionalization as writing program administration was beginning to surface in relation to discussions of teaching composition; through a Transitional Era (1964¿1979), when WPAs gained more responsibility and acknowledgment and began to propose solutions to the problems hindering professionalization; to the Professional Era (1980¿present), when WPAs have realized many of their desired outcomes in the struggle toward professionalization. This history of WPAs not only chronicles their evolution toward professionalization but also aids in that process because it documents the breadth of work and worth of this administrative field. Ultimately, the documentation and validation of this administrative history not only helps frame historical actions, it can help shape future acknowledgment and professionalization of WPAs.
dc.format.extentiv, 228 leavesen_US
dc.format.mediumFormat: Printen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTexas Christian University dissertationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAS38.H413en_US
dc.subject.lcshWriting centers--Administrationen_US
dc.subject.lcshReport writing--Study and teaching (Higher)en_US
dc.subject.lcshEnglish language--Rhetoric--Study and teachingen_US
dc.titleThe struggle toward professionalization: the historical evolution of writing program administratorsen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
etd.degree.departmentDepartment of English
etd.degree.levelDoctoral
local.collegeAddRan College of Liberal Arts
local.departmentEnglish
local.academicunitDepartment of English
dc.type.genreDissertation
local.subjectareaEnglish
dc.identifier.callnumberMain Stacks: AS38 .H413 (Regular Loan)
dc.identifier.callnumberSpecial Collections: AS38 .H413 (Non-Circulating)
etd.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
etd.degree.grantorTexas Christian University


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record