Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorReuter, Frank T.
dc.contributor.authorSelcer, Richard Fillmoreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T15:10:55Z
dc.date.available2019-10-11T15:10:55Z
dc.date.created1980en_US
dc.date.issued1980en_US
dc.identifieraleph-255137en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/33579
dc.description.abstractThe first combined expedition of the Civil War took place at Hatteras Inlet in August, 1861. The roots of that expedition, however, go back to three events in the late spring and summer of 1861: (1) Lincoln's Blockade Proclamation, (2) Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan, and (3) the meetings of the Naval Strategy Board. During the next four years, the term "combined" or "amphibious" operation came to take on its modern meaning. A whole set of specialized tactics and a group of highly colorful and individualistic men developed this new military operation. After Hatteras Inlet, the techniques were further refined at Port Royal (November, 1861) and Roanoke Island (February 1862). A year after the opening shots were fired at Ft. Sumter, the first large-scale attack against a major port took place; that port was New Orleans, largest and richest city of the Confederacy. After New Orleans, the development of combined operations lagged for nearly eighteen months. During that period, Union fortunes suffered three reverses in areas where combined operations had first carried the Union flag--the coast of Texas; Charleston, South Carolina; and the sounds of North Carolina. The last six months of the war saw the Confederacy's only remaining open ports closed by combined attack. This brought down the curtain on military events in the coastal amphibious campaign. But events "behind the scenes" were as important to the development of combined operations as the actual attacks. The personal relations between local Army and Navy commanders, politics in Washington, and the state of military technology in the middle of the nineteenth century all played an important part in combined operations. Finally, the unquestioned success of combined operations as a part of Northern strategy had an impact that went far beyond the Civil War itself. The fear of coastal attacks on the reunited American coastline dominated strategic policy in this country for the rest of the century.
dc.format.extentiv, 380 leaves, bound : illustrations, mapsen_US
dc.format.mediumFormat: Printen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTexas Christian University dissertationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAS38.S448en_US
dc.subject.lcshUnited States--History--Civil War, 1861-1865--Sea controlen_US
dc.titleThe friendly sea, the hostile shore: a strategic studyen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
etd.degree.departmentDepartment of History
etd.degree.levelDoctoral
local.collegeAddRan College of Liberal Arts
local.departmentHistory
local.academicunitDepartment of History
dc.type.genreDissertation
local.subjectareaHistory
dc.identifier.callnumberMain Stacks: AS38 .S448 (Regular Loan)
dc.identifier.callnumberSpecial Collections: AS38 .S448 (Non-Circulating)
etd.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
etd.degree.grantorTexas Christian University


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record