Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCole, Steven G.
dc.contributor.authorReeve, Johnmarshallen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-11T15:11:18Z
dc.date.available2019-10-11T15:11:18Z
dc.date.created1986en_US
dc.date.issued1986en_US
dc.identifieraleph-247220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/34330
dc.description.abstractThe synergy hypothesis emerged from research under the rubric of "mixed-motive dilemmas" and from the recognition that groups tend not to cooperate unless induced to do so. The synergy hypothesis postulates that cooperative cues function to support and reinforce one another so when combined their overall cooperative utility is greater than the sum of the utilities of the single cues. To test the synergy postulate, it was hypothesized that the situation with three cooperative cues would provide a situation that functioned to increase the probability of cooperative behavior to a greater degree than the situations with two cooperative cues, which would provide a situation that functioned to increase the probability of cooperative behavior to a greater degree than the situations with either one or no cooperative cues. Using a potentially intense conflict simulation game and the cooperative cues of trust, equality, and accountability, three sets of analyses tested the synergy hypothesis. The first analysis tested the importance of the number of cues. Chi-square tests showed that the three cue situation promoted more cooperative resolutions to the experimental game than the no cue situation but not significantly more cooperative resolutions than the two cue situations. The second analysis tested the integrative effect of the cues. A 2 x 2 x 2 ANOVA with each cue serving as a factor showed the triple interaction to be only marginally significant (p < .08), and the pattern of means underlying the interaction was not as predicted. The third set of analyses tested the utility of the cues. MDF analyses showed that trust and equality functioned both cooperatively and noncooperatively, as predicted by the synergy hypothesis, as a function of the cue's embedded context. Accountability served as a generally cooperative cue across all contexts. Results were discussed in terms of the status of the synergy hypothesis as a group process phenomenon and its limitations were noted. Directions for future reseach were suggested.
dc.format.extentviii, 134 leaves : illustrationsen_US
dc.format.mediumFormat: Printen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTexas Christian University dissertationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAS38.R43en_US
dc.subject.lcshCooperativenessen_US
dc.titleThe role of situational cues in increasing the probability of cooperative behavior in eight situations: a test of the synergy hypothesisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
etd.degree.departmentDepartment of Psychology
etd.degree.levelDoctoral
local.collegeCollege of Science and Engineering
local.departmentPsychology
local.academicunitDepartment of Psychology
dc.type.genreDissertation
local.subjectareaPsychology
dc.identifier.callnumberMain Stacks: AS38 .R43 (Regular Loan)
dc.identifier.callnumberSpecial Collections: AS38 .R43 (Non-Circulating)
etd.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
etd.degree.grantorTexas Christian University


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record