Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDiel, Lori
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Allegra
dc.date2017-05-19
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T16:22:03Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T16:22:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/19872
dc.description.abstractThe history of art and politics are inextricably linked. This paper builds upon that fact and examines Chancellor Adolf Hitler's desire to acquire the Ghent Altarpiece, which I link to a desire to express the supremacy of Germany in reparation for the humiliation the country had suffered at the end of the First World War. First, I show how Hitler's acquisition of Van Eyck work is not atypical throughout history. In fact Hitler expressly mimicked his aspiration to build the foremost collection of art after Napoleon's reign. Hitler drew on a rich history of looting and the power that he believed one could contrive from such thefts. Furthermore, the historical nature of the Ghent Altarpiece intensified Hitler's desire for it. I also explain the mechanisms and institutions Hitler created to ensure he acquired it, demonstrating the importance placed on art, more specifically the altarpiece, to signify authority over conquered regions. Ultimately, through a focus on one instance of art looting, this research will demonstrate the effort leaders have been willing to exert during times of war to gain what appears to simply be a piece of art-- demonstrating the important role art plays within politics during war. Clearly the seizure of art was believed to demonstrate a leader's power and authority.
dc.titleHitler's Politics of State Owned Art During World War II
etd.degree.departmentArt History
local.collegeCollege of Fine Arts
local.collegeJohn V. Roach Honors College
local.departmentArt


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record