Show simple item record

dc.creatorShah, Meena
dc.creatorJaffery, Manall
dc.creatorAdams-Huet, Beverley
dc.creatorFranklin, Brian
dc.creatorOliver, Jonathan M.
dc.creatorMitchell, Joel B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-25T20:50:54Z
dc.date.available2017-05-25T20:50:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172732
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/19236
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172732
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is unclear how high-protein (HP) and high-monounsaturated fat (HMF) meals affect postprandial blood lipids and lipoprotein particle numbers (LPN). Purpose: To compare a HP versus a HMF meal on postprandial lipid and LPN responses. Methods: Twenty-four participants (age: 36.3±15.0 years; body mass index: 23.6±2.0 kg/m2; 45.8% female) were fed a HP (31.9% energy from protein) and a HMF (35.2% fat and 20.7% monounsaturated fat) meal in a randomized cross-over trial design. Energy and carbohydrate content were the same across meals. Blood samples were drawn in the fasting state and 3 hour postprandial state, and assessed for lipids and LPN. Results: Repeated measures analysis showed a significant (p<0.05) treatment by time interaction effect for triglycerides (TG), the primary variable, total high-density lipoprotein particles (T-HDLP) and T-HDLP minus large-buoyant high-density lipoprotein 2b (T-HDLP--LB-HDL2b). HP versus HMF condition led to significantly lower TG at 120 (geometric mean: 90.1 (95% confidence interval (CI): 76.4-106.3) vs. 146.5 (124.2-172.9) mg/dL) and 180 (101.4 (83.1-123.8) vs. 148.7 (121.9-181.4) mg/dL) min and higher T-HDLP at 120 (mean difference: 297.3 (95% CI: 48.6-545.9) nmol/L) and 180 (291.6 (15.8-567.5) nmol/L) min. The difference in T-HDLP by condition was due to the significantly higher small-dense HDLP (T-HDLP--LB-HDL2b) during HP versus HMF condition at 120 (mean difference: 452.6 (95% CI: 177.4-727.9) nmol/L) and 180 (496.8 (263.1-730.6) nmol/L) min. Area under the curve analysis showed that HP versus HMF condition led to significantly lower TG, non-HDLP, and very-low-density lipoprotein particles (VLDLP) responses but significantly less favorable responses in LB-HDL2b particles, T-HDLP--LB-HDL2b, and LB-HDL2b/T-HDLP ratio. Conclusion: The HP meal led to lower TG, non-HDLP, and VLDLP but less favorable LB-HDL2b, small-dense HDLP, and LB-HDL2b/T-HDLP ratio responses versus a HMF meal. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings over multiple meals.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePLoS One
dc.subjectLipoproteins
dc.subjectDiet
dc.subjectLipids
dc.subjectFats
dc.subjectCholesterol
dc.subjectCarbohydrates
dc.subjectBlood
dc.subjectDrug interactions
dc.titleEffect of meal composition on postprandial lipid concentrations and lipoprotein particle numbers: A randomized cross-over study
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderMeena Shah et al.
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
local.collegeHarris College of Nursing and Health Sciences
local.departmentKinesiology
local.personsShah, Jaffery, Franklin, Oliver, Mitchell (KINE)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/