Show simple item record

dc.creatorNorberg-King, Teresa J.
dc.creatorEmbry, Michelle R.
dc.creatorBelanger, Scott E.
dc.creatorBraunbeck, Thomas
dc.creatorButler, Joshua D.
dc.creatorDorn, Phil B.
dc.creatorFarr, Brianna
dc.creatorGuiney, Patrick D.
dc.creatorHughes, Sarah A.
dc.creatorJeffries, Marlo K. Sellin
dc.creatorJournel, Romain
dc.creatorLéonard, Marc
dc.creatorMcMaster, Mark
dc.creatorOris, James T.
dc.creatorRyder, Kathy
dc.creatorSegner, Helmut
dc.creatorSenac, Thomas
dc.creatorVan Der Kraak, Glen
dc.creatorWhale, Graham
dc.creatorWilson, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T16:01:45Z
dc.date.available2019-07-12T16:01:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4259
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/26403
dc.identifier.urihttps://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/etc.4259
dc.description.abstractSince the 1940s, effluent toxicity testing has been used to assess potential ecological impacts of effluents and help determine necessary treatment options for environmental protection prior to release. Strategic combinations of toxicity tests, analytical tools, and biological monitoring have been developed. Because the number of vertebrates utilized in effluent testing is thought to be much greater than that used for individual chemical testing, there is a new need to develop strategies to reduce the numbers of vertebrates (i.e., fish) used. This need will become more critical as developing nations begin to use vertebrates in toxicity tests to assess effluent quality. A workshop was held to 1) assess the state of science in effluent toxicity testing globally; 2) determine current practices of regulators, industry, private laboratories, and academia; and 3) explore alternatives to vertebrate (fish) testing options and the inclusion of modified/new methods and approaches in the regulatory environment. No single approach was identified, because of a range of factors including regulatory concerns, validity criteria, and wider acceptability of alternatives. However, a suite of strategies in a weight-of-evidence approach would provide the flexibility to meet the needs of the environment, regulators, and the regulated community; and this "toolbox" approach would also support reduced reliance on in vivo fish tests. The present Focus article provides a brief overview of wastewater regulation and effluent testing approaches. Alternative methodologies under development and some of the limitations and barriers to regulatory approaches that can be selected to suit individual country and regional requirements are described and discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
dc.subjectEffluent testingen_US
dc.subjectAnimal alternativesen_US
dc.subjectRegulationen_US
dc.subjectWeight of evidenceen_US
dc.subjectToxicity testingen_US
dc.subjectWastewateren_US
dc.titleAn International Perspective on the Tools and Concepts for Effluent Toxicity Assessments in the Context of Animal Alternatives: Reduction in Vertebrate Useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderTeresa J. Norberg-King et al.
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
local.collegeCollege of Science and Engineering
local.departmentBiology
local.personsJeffries (BIOL)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/