Show simple item record

dc.creatorTwis, Mary K.
dc.creatorCimino, A.
dc.creatorFiles, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-26T18:58:49Z
dc.date.available2022-09-26T18:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270103
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/55781
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Thousands of youth are sexually trafficked each year worldwide. Increased public attention to the commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) of children has resulted in the rapid deployment of hybrid community public health and social service programs for these vulnerable youth. Research on the effectiveness of these advocacy programs is lacking, particularly whether they decrease psychosocial distress and increase readiness to leave CSE. Methods and analysis Cisgender girls under age 18 at the time of CSE, and who were identified as at-risk for sex trafficking revictimization, were included in an evaluation of an anti-trafficking advocacy program in the North Texas region of the United States. The program includes crisis response, case management, referral, and mentoring services in collaboration with multi-disciplinary team (MDT) responses to identified youth sex trafficking. Case management notes, needs assessments and individualized treatment plans were collected at intake and every 30 days until study conclusion. Standardized surveys, including the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, and the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) were collected at intake and every 180 days until the study concluded. Analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, chi-square, multivariate linear and logistic regressions, Poisson regressions, and latent profile analysis. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the Texas Christian University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results of this study will be presented to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals and non-scholarly outlets such as public health and social service conferences. Copyright: © 2022 Twis et al.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePLoS One
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcase management
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstitutional review
dc.subjectmentoring
dc.subjectMultidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support
dc.subjectmultidisciplinary team
dc.subjectneeds assessment
dc.subjectpatient referral
dc.subjectPoisson regression
dc.subjectpublic health
dc.subjectRhode Island
dc.subjectself concept
dc.subjectsex trafficking
dc.subjectsexual exploitation
dc.subjectsocial work
dc.subjectTexas
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjecthuman trafficking
dc.subjectprevention and control
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectsexual behavior
dc.subjectsocial support
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectCase Management
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHuman Trafficking
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectSexual Behavior
dc.subjectSocial Support
dc.subjectSocial Work
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.titleDoes individual advocacy work?: A research and evaluation protocol for a youth anti-sex trafficking program
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder2022 Twis et al
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
local.collegeHarris College of Nursing and Health Sciences
local.departmentSocial Work
local.personsTwis (SOWO)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/