Show simple item record

dc.creatorTwis Mary K.
dc.creatorCimino A.
dc.creatorFiles M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-26T18:58:49Z
dc.date.available2022-09-26T18:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270103
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/55781
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Thousands of youth are sexually trafficked each year worldwide. Increased public attention to the commercial sexual exploitation (CSE) of children has resulted in the rapid deployment of hybrid community public health and social service programs for these vulnerable youth. Research on the effectiveness of these advocacy programs is lacking, particularly whether they decrease psychosocial distress and increase readiness to leave CSE. Methods and analysis Cisgender girls under age 18 at the time of CSE, and who were identified as at-risk for sex trafficking revictimization, were included in an evaluation of an anti-trafficking advocacy program in the North Texas region of the United States. The program includes crisis response, case management, referral, and mentoring services in collaboration with multi-disciplinary team (MDT) responses to identified youth sex trafficking. Case management notes, needs assessments and individualized treatment plans were collected at intake and every 30 days until study conclusion. Standardized surveys, including the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, and the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) were collected at intake and every 180 days until the study concluded. Analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, chi-square, multivariate linear and logistic regressions, Poisson regressions, and latent profile analysis. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the Texas Christian University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results of this study will be presented to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals and non-scholarly outlets such as public health and social service conferences. Copyright: © 2022 Twis et al.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcePLoS ONE
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectcase managementen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinstitutional reviewen_US
dc.subjectmentoringen_US
dc.subjectMultidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Supporten_US
dc.subjectmultidisciplinary teamen_US
dc.subjectneeds assessmenten_US
dc.subjectpatient referralen_US
dc.subjectPoisson regressionen_US
dc.subjectpublic healthen_US
dc.subjectRhode Islanden_US
dc.subjectself concepten_US
dc.subjectsex traffickingen_US
dc.subjectsexual exploitationen_US
dc.subjectsocial worken_US
dc.subjectTexasen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectchilden_US
dc.subjecthuman traffickingen_US
dc.subjectprevention and controlen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectsexual behavioren_US
dc.subjectsocial supporten_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectCase Managementen_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHuman Traffickingen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectSexual Behavioren_US
dc.subjectSocial Supporten_US
dc.subjectSocial Worken_US
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleDoes individual advocacy work?: A research and evaluation protocol for a youth anti-sex trafficking program
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder2022 Twis et al
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
local.collegeHarris College of Nursing and Health Sciences
local.departmentSocial Work
local.personsTwis (SOWO)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/