Show simple item record

dc.creatorLeukefeld, Carl G.
dc.creatorKnight, Danica K.
dc.creatorBelenko, Steven
dc.creatorRobertson, Angela A.
dc.creatorWiley, Tisha R. A.
dc.creatorWasserman, Gail A.
dc.creatorDiClemente, Ralph J.
dc.creatorBrody, Gene H.
dc.creatorKnudsen, Hannah K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T16:35:53Z
dc.date.available2022-12-07T16:35:53Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-10-s1-a34
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/56571
dc.description.abstractService organizational implementation trial The U.S. juvenile justice system has a number of possible behavioral health service community linkages for substance abuse and HIV services. However, there have only been a small number of systemic studies that examine and seek to improve these community behavioral health linkages for involved youth. Implementation science, as an emerging area, is a way of identifying, testing, and understanding effective strategies for translating treatment and prevention evidence-based approaches into community behavioral health service delivery. The purpose of this presentation, within the context of the Juvenile Justice-Translating Research Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS) implementation behavioral health trial, is to describe the diverse settings in which the study will be initiated and how partners are involved in the study design. State partners include juvenile justice (JJ) and behavioral health services organizations in seven states (Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas) and the District of Columbia. Factors associated with selection, participation, and implementing the study in 36 sites will be explored. Each site will include a JJ agency and up to two community behavioral health service organizations for 7–10 implementation team members representing executive, management, supervisory, and line staff. JJ partner involvement is helping to design the study protocol that is both feasible for sites and meets partner needs. Study sites are defined as a county or service area, which can include multiple counties when behavioral health services are sparse. Site clusters will be used, which are defined within each state to assure that each of the six research centers have an equal number of experimental and control sites to take into account broader contextual factors. Options for defining clusters include county size, JJ youth population, urban/rural, or type of community supervision — probation or juvenile drug court. Sites will not be preselected for substance use or related behavioral health service needs, so youth are included with diverse behavioral health needs. Two JJ partners have actively participated on the study design work group, and the protocol has been vetted through partners at steering committee meetings and conference calls.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.sourceAddiction Science & Clinical Practice
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectHealth psychology
dc.subjectSocial work
dc.subjectPsychological intervention
dc.subjectJustice (ethics)
dc.subjectDrug court
dc.subjectService (business)
dc.subjectPopulation
dc.subjectBioinformatics
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectApplied psychology
dc.titleCommunity involvement in a juvenile partner justice behavioral health
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0
local.collegeCollege of Science and Engineering
local.departmentInstitute of Behavioral Research
local.personsKnight (IBR)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record