Show simple item record

dc.creatorJagim, Andrew R.
dc.creatorWright, Glenn A.
dc.creatorCamic, Clayton L.
dc.creatorKisiolek, Jacob N.
dc.creatorLuedke, Joel
dc.creatorOliver, Jonathan M.
dc.creatorFischer, Karen M.
dc.creatorJones, Margaret T.
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T21:37:21Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T21:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2020.1863455
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/56978
dc.description.abstractBackground: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between training load and next-day recovery in collegiate American football (AF) players during pre-season. Methods: Seventeen athletes (Linemen, n = 6; Non-linemen, n = 11) participated in the 14-day study wearing monitoring (accelerometer + heart rate) sensors during on-field practice sessions throughout pre-season to assess the physiological (PL), mechanical load (ML) and recording of session RPE (sRPE load) immediately post-practice. Prior to practice, participants completed a drop-jump reactive strength index (RSI) test and reported perceived recovery status (PRS). Loaded counter movement vertical jump was assessed before and after pre-season. Results: For every one unit increase in sRPE load, RSI declined by 0.03. Non-linemen had a lower RSI value of 73.1 units compared to linemen. For every one unit increase in ML, the PRS decreased by 0.01. Non-linemen recorded higher average ML during week 2 (ES = 1.17) compared to linemen. Non-linemen recorded higher RSI values in weeks 1 (ES = ?1.41) and 2 (ES = ?1.72) compared to linemen. All training load and recovery parameters were lower week 2 compared to week 1 (p < 0.05) for all players. Conclusions: Next-day RSI values were influenced by sRPE load while next-day PRS appears to be more influenced by ML. No difference in PL or sRPE load was observed been groups despite non-linemen completing a higher ML throughout the preseason. A combination of training load and recovery metrics may be needed to monitor the fatigue and state of readiness of each player.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.sourceScience and Medicine in Football
dc.subjectPractice load
dc.subjectrecovery status
dc.subjectfatigue
dc.subjectpreseason training
dc.titleRelationship between training load and recovery in collegiate American football players during pre-season training
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
local.collegeHarris College of Nursing and Health Sciences
local.departmentKinesiology
local.personsOliver (KINE)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record