Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoatwright, Amelia
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-08T21:57:13Z
dc.date.available2023-06-08T21:57:13Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-19
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/59417
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has highlighted the export increases that the Aid-for-Trade foreign aid program has precipitated in aid recipient countries. Here I argue that trade openness is the real variable of interest to measure if Aid-for-Trade is accomplishing its goal to remove supply and trade related barriers particularly in least developed countries. I run gravity model regressions on directed dyadic data of donor-recipient country pairs between 2002 and 2019. The data analysis for Aid-for-Trade allocations from the US, UK, Germany, France, and EU to 45 states in Sub-Saharan Africa does not support that Aid-for-Trade is increasing trade openness, export growth, or bilateral donor-recipient trade flows. This suggests that more Aid-for-Trade funding should be allocated to the neediest countries or that a new aid program or development program should be implemented.
dc.subjectAid-for-Trade
dc.subjectAid for Trade
dc.subjectTrade Openness
dc.subjectTrade-to-GDP Ratio
dc.subjectExport Growth
dc.subjectExports
dc.subjectTrade
dc.subjectForeign Aid
dc.subjectWorld Trade Organization
dc.subjectWTO
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africa
dc.subjectOfficial Development Assistance
dc.subjectODA
dc.subjectEconomic Growth
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.subjectFrance
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectEuropean Union
dc.titleThe Effect of Aid-for-Trade on Trade Openness, Trade Flows, and Exports
etd.degree.departmentPolitical Science
local.departmentPolitical Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail
This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record