Multi-center matched cohort study of convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19Show simple item record
dc.creator | Zhou, C. K. | |
dc.creator | Bennett, M. M. | |
dc.creator | Villa, C. H. | |
dc.creator | Hammonds, K. P. | |
dc.creator | Lu, Y. | |
dc.creator | Ettlinger, J. | |
dc.creator | Priest, E.L. | |
dc.creator | Gottlieb, R. L. | |
dc.creator | Davis, S. | |
dc.creator | Mays, E. | |
dc.creator | Clarke, T. C. | |
dc.creator | Shoaibi, A. | |
dc.creator | Wong, H.-L. | |
dc.creator | Anderson, S. A. | |
dc.creator | Kelly, R. J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T17:57:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T17:57:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273223 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.tcu.edu/handle/116099117/55826 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Although frequently used in the early pandemic, data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) remain mixed. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of CCP in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in real-world practices during the first two waves of the pandemic in a multi-hospital healthcare system in Texas. Methods and findings Among 11,322 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection from July 1, 2020 to April 15, 2021, we included patients who received CCP and matched them with those who did not receive CCP within ±2 days of the transfusion date across sites within strata of sex, age groups, days and use of dexamethasone from hospital admission to the match date, and oxygen requirements 4-12 hours prior to the match date. Cox proportional hazards model estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for effectiveness outcomes in a propensity score 1:1 matched cohort. Pre-defined safety outcomes were described. We included 1,245 patients each in the CCP treated and untreated groups. Oxygen support was required by 93% of patients at the baseline. The pre-defined primary effectiveness outcome of 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality (HR = 0.85; 95%CI: 0.66,1.10) were similar between treatment groups. Sensitivity and stratified analyses found similar null results. CCP-treated patients were less likely to be discharged alive (HR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.74, 0.91), and more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (HR = 1.48; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.96). Safety outcomes were rare and similar between treatment groups. Conclusion The findings in this large, matched cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and mostly requiring oxygen support at the time of treatment, do not support a clinical benefit in 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality for CCP. Future studies should assess the potential benefits with specifically high-titer units in perhaps certain subgroups of patients (e.g. those with early disease or immunocompromised). © 2022 Public Library of Science. All rights reserved. | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | PLOS | |
dc.rights | Public Domain | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ | |
dc.source | PLoS One | |
dc.subject | angiotensin receptor antagonist | |
dc.subject | anticoagulant agent | |
dc.subject | antithrombocytic agent | |
dc.subject | azithromycin | |
dc.subject | chloroquine | |
dc.subject | dexamethasone | |
dc.subject | dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase inhibitor | |
dc.subject | hydrocortisone | |
dc.subject | hydroxychloroquine | |
dc.subject | prednisone | |
dc.subject | remdesivir | |
dc.subject | SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma | |
dc.subject | tocilizumab | |
dc.subject | oxygen | |
dc.subject | adult | |
dc.subject | aged | |
dc.subject | all cause mortality | |
dc.subject | Article | |
dc.subject | artificial ventilation | |
dc.subject | clinical outcome | |
dc.subject | cohort analysis | |
dc.subject | confidence interval | |
dc.subject | controlled study | |
dc.subject | convalescent plasma transfusion | |
dc.subject | coronavirus disease 2019 | |
dc.subject | drug safety | |
dc.subject | female | |
dc.subject | gender | |
dc.subject | groups by age | |
dc.subject | hazard ratio | |
dc.subject | health care system | |
dc.subject | hospital admission | |
dc.subject | hospital patient | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | hypertension | |
dc.subject | in-hospital mortality | |
dc.subject | major clinical study | |
dc.subject | male | |
dc.subject | multicenter study | |
dc.subject | oxygen therapy | |
dc.subject | pandemic | |
dc.subject | proportional hazards model | |
dc.subject | retrospective study | |
dc.subject | sensitivity analysis | |
dc.subject | Texas | |
dc.subject | thromboembolism | |
dc.subject | passive immunization | |
dc.subject | procedures | |
dc.subject | therapy | |
dc.subject | treatment outcome | |
dc.subject | Cohort Studies | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Immunization, Passive | |
dc.subject | Oxygen | |
dc.subject | SARS-CoV-2 | |
dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | |
dc.title | Multi-center matched cohort study of convalescent plasma for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.license | CC0 1.0 | |
local.college | Burnett School of Medicine | |
local.department | Burnett School of Medicine | |
local.persons | Gottlieb (SOM) |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Research Publications [1008]